Measuring Our Success
This plan sets a clear goal - raising educational attainment - and describes a number of strategies that are designed to move us toward that goal. It is, of course, possible that we have not selected the correct strategies. That is why this plan establishes 20 accountability measures by which progress can be monitored. If the strategies described in this plan are working, then the accountability measures will reflect that fact. If, however, these accountability measures are not being achieved, then the strategies must be re-examined. Accountability is the path to change. These measures are calculated so that meeting the ten-year goals should translate into meeting the overall educational attainment goals of this plan. The accountability measures are the “report card” of the University System of Ohio. They will be posted on the website and updated as frequently as data is available.
Alignment between the goals of the University System of Ohio and individual institutions will form the basis for a constructive working relationship between institutions and the state. It will be on this basis that funds will be allocated, and that the success of the system as a whole can be demonstrated to the Governor, the General Assembly and the public. The accountability metrics measure the performance of the system as a whole. Each institution contributes differently to these measurements - some will grow in enrollment, others will attract more research dollars, and so on. To make certain that the collective actions of the institutions are helping the state meet its overall goals, each institution, through its president and with the approval of the Board of Trustees, will submit to the Chancellor, by December 31, 2008, a document setting out the contribution that the institution will make to the achievement of the state’s overall accountability measures. In consultation with the institutions, the Chancellor will develop and distribute a template for this submission. The initial report should cover a six-year period. The Chancellor will review all the submissions together, and in consultation with the institutions, seek any changes necessary to ensure that all the goals of the University System of Ohio are met. The Chancellor will then use the individual submissions to measure the contributions of each institution to the fulfillment of the University System of Ohio goals.
- Use our Dashboard to track the progress of these measures.
- See Also: Accountability Measures
- See Also Metric Definitions
Access
The University System of Ohio will be a flexible, integrated higher education provider, making the widest range of educational opportunities available to, and raising the educational aspirations of, all Ohioans.
- Total post-secondary enrollment: The total number of students attending the University System of Ohio is a measure of the aspiration of Ohioans to obtain a post-secondary education, the accessibility and affordability of the system, and serves as the basis for building a strong and educated workforce. Total post-secondary enrollment includes all students enrolled in associate, bachelor’s, graduate, and professional degree programs. 2017 TARGET: Increase enrollment by 230,000 students, consistent with the goal established by Governor Strickland. Source: Higher Education Information System (HEI). Current level is based on Fall 2006 data.
- Total STEM degrees awarded: STEM–Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics– represent critical areas of need for the state’s ever-changing economy. Increasing the production of these high demand degrees is a top priority of the state’s business community. 2017 TARGET: In 2005, the Ohio Business Alliance for Higher Education and the Economy set a goal to double the number of STEM bachelor’s degrees granted by Ohio colleges and universities by 2015. It is the goal of this plan to double the total amount of STEM degrees (associates, bachelor’s, graduate and professional) conferred by University System of Ohio institutions by 2017, including a 110 percent increase in bachelor’s degrees in STEM disciplines. Source: HEI. Current level is based on July 06 - June 07 data.
- Total enrollees age 25 and older: “Non-traditional students” are a significant untapped pool of learners in the state. These students are more likely to be deeply rooted in the state and thus represent an important target in meeting the goal of raising educational attainment. 2017 TARGET: Adult learners will represent the biggest portion of enrollment growth. In 2017, they will make up one half of the total enrollment of the University System of Ohio. Source: HEI. Current level is based on Fall 2006 data.
- Total degrees awarded to first generation college students: An increase in the success of this population would not only have an impact on the state’s educational attainment, but would also represent a significant long-term return on the state’s investment because college graduates are likely to make sure their children also go to college. This indicator includes associate, bachelor’s, graduate, and professional degrees. 2017 TARGET: One third of all degrees will be awarded to first generation students. Source: HEI cross tied with the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) data. Current level is based on July 06 - June 07 data. (The data source only includes students who filled out a FAFSA and completed the section regarding parents’ education. About 76 percent of all students who earned an undergraduate degree in July 06 - June 07 filled out this portion of the FAFSA.)
- Percent of degrees awarded to Black and Hispanic students: While the ethnic background of the University System of Ohio’s enrollment currently reflects the make-up of the state’s population, there remains a gap between the number of minority and non-minority students receiving degrees. The University System of Ohio must not only enroll minority students but ensure that they graduate, thereby increasing educational attainment overall and ensuring the development of a diverse workforce. This indicator includes associate, bachelor’s, graduate, and professional degrees. 2017 TARGET:The percent of degrees awarded to these minorities should equal the percentage of the minorities in Ohio’s population. Currently that percentage is 13.98 percent, representing a gap of over 5 percent. Source: HEI (current level is from July 06 - June 07 data) and US Census, American Community Survey (current level is from 2006 data).23
Ohio's Black and Hispanic population percentage is estimated from percent that are Black or African American Alone and percent that are of Hispanic origin but not Black or African American Alone.
Quality
The University System of Ohio will be known for the excellence of the teaching and learning of its faculty and students and the reputation of its institutions.
- Improvement in actual graduation rate over expected graduation rate 2007-2017: An expected graduation rate is a prediction based on characteristics of the student body population. The difference between the actual graduation rate and the expected graduation rate is an indicator of the value the system adds to its students' education. This metric uses the 2007 graduation rate as a baseline and will show the improvement over the next 10 years. More detail on this metric can be found in Appendix C. 2017 TARGET: Actual graduation rate exceeds expected rate by 10 percent. Source: HEI.
- Number of first time enrollees in the top 20 percent SAT/ACT (at university main campuses):This indicator measures the extent to which the University System of Ohio is a system of choice for top students both from within Ohio and outside the state. Data is limited to students at university main campuses. 2017 TARGET: Increase top students by 50 percent. Source: Survey of public universities, fall 2007 freshman.
- Percent of facilities in satisfactory condition or needing only minor rehabilitation: This measure of facility quality takes into account the condition of the building and whether it meets the technological and equipment needs of the classes it houses. 2017 TARGET: 70 percent Source: HEI (current level based on Fall 2006 data).
- Total size of endowments and foundations per FTE: Private giving represents an important resource that could play an integral role in lowering tuition and increasing financial aid. State rank data is not available. 2017 TARGET: Double current level Source: Survey of all public universities and colleges. Current level is based on FY2006 data.
- Federally financed research spending per capita - national rank: The most widely accepted measure of a research university’s competitiveness is through grants awarded from the federal government. Research attracts top students, faculty, and jobs to Ohio. This indicator only takes into account public universities and therefore does not compare Ohio with other state’s independent institutions or higher education research as a whole. 2017 TARGET:To be in the top 10 of all states in terms of federal dollars attracted to public universities. Source: National Science Foundation. Current level based on 2006 data. National ranking based on states' public university research spending per capita.
Affordability and Efficiency
The University System of Ohio will enable all Ohioans to afford the education and training they need to succeed.
- Average out of pocket cost: An institution’s true affordability is not its sticker price, but how much the student actually pays. In order to compete for both students and residents nationally, it is essential to make sure the student can afford a college education based on his family’s income status. Unit record financial data is being collected for the first time this year. Data will be available in spring 2009. 2017 TARGET:TBD Source: HEI.
- Tuition and fees of a combined associate and bachelor’s degree offered on a community college or university regional campus-national rank: Using the existing infrastructure of community colleges and university regional campuses, in 10 years the University System of Ohio will offer a low-cost, open access, combined associate and bachelor’s degree within 30 miles of every Ohioan. 2017 TARGET:To be one of the lowest 10 states in price for a combined associate and bachelor’s degree. Source: This data is not currently collected in this form, but will be reported in the future.
- State Funding per FTE- relationship to the national average: The state of Ohio represents the largest non-revenue source for the University System of Ohio, and is an important economic driver and industry for the state. This indicator measures the extent to which the state is supporting higher education compared to the national average of state spending on public higher education. 2017 TARGET: Above the national average. Source: State Higher Education Executive Officers: State Higher Education Finance (SHEF), FY 2006 (http://www.sheeo.org/finance/shef/shef_data.htm). This metric compares only state, not local, support.
- Percentage of first time enrollees below age 21 with equivalent of one semester or more of college credit earned during high school: Currently Ohio is below average in both early college and AP offerings. Through programs like PSEO and Seniors to Sophomores, students can earn college credit for free and be able to graduate from college in a more timely manner. 2017 TARGET: 20 percent Source: HEI. Current level is based on Fall 2006 data.
- Percentage of bachelor’s degree recipients with at least one year of credit from a community college: Seamless transfer will allow more students to start their post-secondary education at a community college. Utilizing this option reduces cost to the student and the state. 2017 TARGET: 25 percent, a quarter of all bachelor’s degree graduates. Source: HEI. Current level is based on FY 2007 data.
Economic Leadership
The University System of Ohio will provide the intellectual and organizational infrastructure to measurably improve the economic outlook for all Ohioans.
- Industrially financed research per capita - national rank: Meeting the needs of Ohio’s industries is a central goal of the University System of Ohio. Industrial research spending is a signal that businesses are choosing our universities to perform research that improves their bottom line, and signals our alignment with the needs of industry. Again, this research indicator only measures public university research dollars. 2017 TARGET: #1 Source: National Science Foundation, 2006 (National ranking based on states’ public university research spending per capita)
- Total international students and Ohio students studying abroad: The University System of Ohio must be a globalized system attracting students from other countries and encouraging our students to study abroad. Our students must be prepared for the demands and challenges of today’s globalized economy. 2017 TARGET: International students to be 5 percent of total enrollment. Study abroad to increase 10 percent per year. Source: International Students: HEI. Current level is from July 06 - June 07. Study Abroad: Open Doors FY2006
- Invention Disclosures filed plus university start ups attracting more than $1 million of venture capital: Invention disclosures lead to the establishment of new and cutting edge technologies which lead to the formation of start ups that establish successful businesses and attract talent and venture capital to the campus. This is a measure of both innovation and commercialization. 2017 TARGET:TBD Source: Technology Transfer Offices. Due to survey timing, the number of university start ups attracting more than $1 million of venture capital will not be known until after the release of this report.
- Business Satisfaction – measured through survey: A business satisfaction survey will be developed through the Ohio Business Roundtable and the Ohio Business Alliance for Higher Education and the Economy. See this report’s Relationship with the Business Community section and Appendix B for more details. 2017 TARGET:TBD
- Number of students engaged in internships and co-ops: Through building connections between businesses and our students, we will ensure that our institutions produce graduates with valuable work experience and give our graduates a connection to help them stay in Ohio. 2017 TARGET: 100,000: More than doubling the current amount. Source: HEI. Current level is based on Fall 2006 students enrolled in internship or co-op programs anytime from July 06 - June 2007 (includes graduate and undergraduate students). Note: Not all campuses currently collect this data accurately, so this may not include all co-ops and internships.
The Ohio College Portrait
Universities
In addition to the specific accountability measures that reflect Ohio’s goals, there is a need for schools to provide the public with information to review the universities’ performance on a wide range of measures and to compare that data to other schools across Ohio and the nation. While schools have expressed a willingness to measure and report such results, there has been little agreement over the years on the best method for doing so, and outright hostility to some of the ranking systems available from private vendors. Recognizing this problem, a consortium of public universities across the country joined together to develop the Voluntary System of Accountability (VSA). The VSA allows participating schools to report relevant information about their costs and performance in a standardized format that enables valid comparisons to be made between schools.
Schools participating in the VSA agree to administer two important assessments, one that measures the quality of student engagement (or satisfaction) at the school, and one that measures learning outcomes. Schools are given a choice of assessment tools to use in each area. In the area of student satisfaction, the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) has received wide acceptance, and should therefore be used by all schools in the University System of Ohio. The measurements of learning outcomes, which focus on critical thinking, communication and problem-solving skills, are still under development. Schools have requested continued flexibility in working with these tools, and, in the near term, this is appropriate. The chancellor will work with the institutions to review the state of knowledge of these assessments and to move towards a common assessment of learning outcomes across the system.
The results of these assessments will be incorporated with the other financial and student data called for by the VSA into an Ohio College Portrait, which will be available for every University System of Ohio school. This Portrait will include a six-page, web-based template organized into three areas:
- Student and parent information that includes data about costs of attendance, degree offerings, living arrangements, graduate placement, student characteristics, graduation rates, transfer rates, and data about student progress.
- Student experiences and attitudes that offer a portrait of student learning experiences, activities and satisfaction, and their perceptions of a university’s commitment to student success, determined by the results of student surveys.
- Student learning outcomes in critical thinking and written communication across all academic disciplines.
The Ohio College Portrait will provide easily accessible and understandable information for prospective students about the qualities and outcomes of the participating campuses, allowing users to compare apples to apples. Through standardized graphs, pie charts and hyperlinks in a common format, students and parents can browse the site for information regarding price, financial aid, degree programs, success, retention, campus safety, future plans of graduates, student satisfaction, student learning outcomes and community engagement.
The Ohio College Portrait will serve not only students and parents, but also policymakers, faculty and staff. The program responds to requests often made by policymakers for accessible, transparent, and comparable data by requiring each institution to collect and present the data in a way that will demonstrate the impact of the state’s investment on student learning and higher education. In addition, the section of the Ohio College Portrait on student engagement and learning outcomes will allow faculty and staff to gain additional knowledge about how students are learning by measuring progress in the key cognitive skill areas of critical thinking, analytic reasoning, and written communication.
The Ohio College Portrait requires measurement of community engagement, an important dimension of university activity. Community engagement is the practice of collaborating with the larger community for the mutual benefit of the citizens and the university. Faculty and student engagement in community-based service or research creates educationally enriching experiences for students and helps communities address problems and improve the quality of life of their citizens by utilizing the university’s intellectual and human resources.
Adopting the Ohio College Portrait will allow University System of Ohio member institutions to:
- Improve performances by carefully and rigorously measuring teaching, learning, and student engagement in educationally purposeful activities, particularly in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine fields.
- Demonstrate aspirations to national and international recognition.
- Identify effective educational practices by measuring educational outcomes.
- Demonstrate efficient, cost-conscious stewardship of taxpayer dollars.
- Demonstrate national leadership in working to improve the quality, innovation, access and cost of undergraduate educational programs.
- Demonstrate achievement in institutional missions and preserving diversity. The Ohio College Portrait will report information on student success and progress rates, institutional characteristics, and various costs in a way that clearly demonstrates greater institutional accountability for student learning and development. Stakeholders will be able to see the contributions made by higher education to the communities in which institutions are located and the state’s economy as a whole.
Community Colleges
Ohio’s network of community colleges is committed to implementing an accountability system parallel to the version being adopted by Ohio’s public universities. The community colleges’ accountability system will:
- Measure and report student engagement by utilizing the CCSSE as its survey tool.
- Assess general education outcomes through the development of a common template, which will be used to report general education outcomes, measurements used and results, and share information on how the results will be used to make improvements.
- Assess learning outcomes within technical programs by developing a similar template for the reporting of technical program outcomes, measurements used and results, and how the results will be used to make improvements.
The accountability metrics will be periodically reviewed for their appropriateness to encourage a continuous improvement process.

